Jill Blackman vs Gail Sherriff Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W L W
Form
W W W W W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Blackman 1 - 2 Sherriff
They have played 8 sets in total, with Blackman winning 4 and Sherriff winning 4. The last match between Blackman and Sherriff was at the Wimbledon, 20-06-1966, First, Grass with Gail Sherriff getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jill Blackman | 1 |
| Gail Sherriff | 2 |
| Blackman | Stats | Sherriff |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 82 | Age | 80 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 67% (196-97) | Career Total W/L | 66% (531-270) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 2 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 9-7 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 43 | Games Won | 43 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jill Blackman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 9-7 4-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| UNK | H2H | ||||
| F | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Gail Sherriff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||||
| F | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (196/97) | Win/Loss | 66% (531/270) |
| 63% (405/242) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (1132/626) |
| 100% (3315/) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (9099/6916) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 1.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 21.83 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (185/279) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (517/774) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 63% (54/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (101/192) |
| 93% (175/162) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (530/478) |
| 7% (175/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (530/49) |
| 23% (106/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (255/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
